Thursday, December 29, 2016

Scientology: A&E 'Hypocrites' for yanking their 'KKK' show while paying Leah Remini for trash talk



The Church of Scientology has gone on the attack against A&E, alleging a glaring double standard by canceling "Generation KKK" but touting its Leah Remini anti-Scientology program.

TMZ obtained a letter Scientology's lawyer fired off to A&E, in which it scoffs at the network's decision to pull the plug on the 'KKK' show because producers paid some of the Klan members money. A&E said it was a direct violation of its policies to pay the subjects of a documentary.

The Scientology lawyer counters in the letter:

"Church of Scientology understands that two on-air accusers/participants in Leah Remini's docuseries, "Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath" received substantial cash payments for their participation, in violation of the same standards."

The letter goes on to essentially accuse A&E of becoming partners in Remini's show, giving them "free advertising and promotion for anti-Scientology books they have published."

And the lawyer says:

"It is hypocritical for A&E to proclaim its intent to 'expose and combat racism and hatred in all its forms' in cancelling the KKK show and at the same time promote Leah Remini's program which promotes hatred that A&E claims that it wants to stop."

An official at A&E tells us there's a difference in the 2 shows because Remini is an executive producer on her show and she's "not the member of a hate group."

We reached out to Remini's rep but so far, no word back.

(Taken from http://www.tmz.com/2016/12/28/scientology-a-and-e-kkk-show-leah-remini/)

For more information, see: http://www.leahreminiaftermath.com

Church of Scientology's official statement re: Leah Remini's 'reality' TV show 

Leah Remini's 'reality' show, like her last one, is nothing more than a scripted, rehearsed, acted and dramatized work of fiction. She and the other anti-Scientologists in her program have been expelled from the Church for unethical conduct.

Many of the family members of those Leah Remini interviewed have voiced their outrage that their personal, private family matters are being used as fodder for 'reality' television and have informed the producers of the show what really affected their relationships. It was their choice to no longer associate with these toxic personalities. The Church respects the religious beliefs of others and their families' personal choices.

Leah Remini has disparaged and exploited her former faith through a series of failed publicity stunts, culminating in her 'reality' television show—featuring a cast of admitted liars who have, for a profit, been telling differing versions of the same false tales of abuse for years, many reviewed and discredited in courts of law. That A&E would promote their agenda smacks of bigotry.

Within the last month Leah Remini attempted to extort first $500,000 followed by another demand for $1,000,000 ($1.5 million total) from the Church because we responded with the truth to her dishonest and despicable harassment of the Church and its leader. It is sad that Leah Remini wishes to exploit for money those who tirelessly worked to help her when no one else was willing to tolerate her behavior. The Church was always there for Leah Remini, including picking her up from the ground after her meltdown following her firing from The Talk.

Leah Remini has become what she once vowed she would never be: 'This bitter ex-Scientologist.' As we have stated numerous times, Leah Remini needs to move on with her life and career and stop blaming the Church and others for all of her personal and professional setbacks. Most of all, she needs to quit promoting hatred and religious intolerance as a means to line her pockets.
'Leah Remini: Aftermath' is really 'Leah Remini: After Money.'

The real story of the Church of Scientology, what it does, its beliefs and practices, is available at www.scientology.org

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Thursday, July 07, 2016

How Our Beloved Royal Family Is Cleverly Manipulated By Psychiatry For Commercial Profit

by E. Kenneth Eckersley, former Magistrate and Retired Justice of the Peace, CEO Society for an Addiction Free Europe (SAFE), FCMI, FIOD, HonMPHMA(Int), HSDC, MABFDFE (Stockholm and Brussels)


Many British citizens are shocked to hear that the man, who in the last few decades has done most to promote drug addiction of all types in the U.K., is to be recommended for a Knighthood by 10, Downing Street.

With nearly 2.4 Million elderly N.H.S. patients involuntarily addicted to prescription drugs, and 180,000 former illegal heroin users addicted to prescribed methadone or buprenorphine, there is every reason for psychiatric Professor John Strang to be feted, honoured and rewarded by the pharmaceutical industry for his truly magnificent contribution to the wide and profitable marketing of their addictive products.

Professor John Strang
The Government's National Audit Office reports that addicts on methadone and other O.S.T. prescriptions cost the Exchequer (and thus also the Taxpayer) some £8.46 BILLION EACH AND EVERY YEAR to maintain, and the likely cost of servicing the 2.4 Million involuntary patients on benzos, etc., probably boosts that wasteful pharmaceutical spending to over £10 BILLION – likely the largest single drain on the N.H.S. which increases every year because no cures are achieved.

When Professor John Strang blatantly used his 31⁄2 to 4 year Payment by Results “pilots” to kill off the U.K's excellent “November 2010 Drugs Strategy”, he not only ensured a continuation of massively escalating pharmaceutical drug prescribing, he also ensured a continuation of Britain's place as the addiction capital of Europe.

Unfortunately, the members of two organisations, both of which enjoy the Queen's patronage (the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society), have been responsible for leading our country into this wasteful, decadent and immensely expensive state.

The British Royal Family
To understand this, it is vital to recognise that the only way one can become addicted to a drug is by actually consuming that drug.

Nobody can ever become addicted to a drug which they never take, because it is the taking of two or three doses of an addictive drug which creates addiction.

Chemical company bosses know this and so do the psychiatrists they support ­ whose main professional role today is the “pushing” into the society of addictive and / or hypnotic pharmaceutical prescription drugs. Drugs paid for by U.K. taxpayers via the Exchequer and the N.H.S.

By slowly, over the last 68 years, moving the bulk of N.H.S. services into palliative none cure procedures ­ i.e the managing of symptoms rather than the eradicating of causes ­ pharmaceutical producers and distributors have developed possibly the largest and most profitable market in the world.

A market demand driven by irresistible addiction to chemical products, for which the users themselves don't even have to pay! A market comprised of PHYSICAL sickness and disease “management” and (with the help of psychiatry) MENTAL HEALTH habit “management” plus MENTAL HEALTH behaviour “management”.

Royal College of Psychiatrists, London
Which regrettably brings us back to the role the Royal Family have been tricked into playing in the increasingly wide and profitable marketing of addictive pharmaceutical products.

With the approval of her husband William and the Queen, the Duchess of Cambridge has quite rightly become concerned by the increase in “mental health problems” reported across the country by psychiatrists campaigning for more government funding of the “mental health sector”.

On the face of things, an admirable cause deserving of royal patronage, if you actually don't know much about mental health problems, what they really are and how they arise.

And the problem with psychiatry is that that so­-called profession does not know much about mental health problems, what they really are and how they arise!

Psychiatry's job is to deliver ­ as many members of our society as they can ­ to daily and multi­-daily drug “treatment” in the form of “mental health management by prescription”.

Royal Pharmaceutical Society
And the easiest way to do this is to label a wide and increasing variety of normal behaviour as “a mental health problem”!

The psychiatric “bible”: “The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders” they first published with a dozen or so so­-called “mental health disorders” in 1952, has today grown into a 30 times longer list of 365 so­-called “mental health disorders”, practically all of which propose and recommend the prescribing of one drug or another, the vast bulk of which are addictive and / or hypnotic in their action.

As a consequence, today, the main disorder being "TREATED" daily across the length and breadth of the United Kingdom is psycho-pharmaceutically deliberately induced DRUG ADDICTION.

Already mentioned are the 2.4 Million of mainly elderly N.H.S. patients and the 180,000 O.S.T. methadone addicts, but to these must be added the further millions of various age groups prescribed Ritalin for so­-called Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Paxil for so­-called Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), and Prozac and a host of other addictive drugs for a variety of other so­called “mental disorders” ­ “disorders” which in most cases are merely aspects of normal emotional behaviour or just straightforward “growing­ up”.

The Duchess of Cambridge is to be praised for her interest in reducing mental health problems in the society, but unfortunately her support of psychiatric prescription based so­-called “treatment” procedures for invented mental disorders actually has the exact opposite effect, “treated” pushing as it does thousands of citizens, both young and old, into a lifetime of addiction, solely in order to create profitable irresistible consumers for the psychiatrist's pharmaceutical running mates.

Regrettably, it is nearly impossible to obtain an audience with any influential members of staff at either Buckingham or Kensington Palace, and even if one could, in order to defend themselves, the psycho­pharms would blatantly accuse the tellers of the truths here exposed ­ of disloyal criticism of the Queen, her grandson and his wife, rather than the exposure it actually is of psychiatry and pharmaceutical suppliers.

This stops our sane, dedicated and hard­working Royal Family from hearing the truth about mental health, psychiatry and suppressive pharmaceutical marketing methods.

And this power to insulate Royalty against hearing the truth has been developed over the last 66 years by spending millions of £pounds on the constant blackening, side­lining, ridiculing, criticising, defaming and marginalising around the world, of those who actually do understand the human mind and who are really able to rescue our people from so­-called “mental health problems”.

If Kensington Palace was allowed by their psycho­pharm “protectors” to study: “DIANETICS® – The Modern Science of Mental Health”, and to know about the fantastic results which Dianetics delivers to millions of people in hundreds of countries around the world, the psycho­pharms would soon lose millions and millions of £pounds worth of government support and we would have a healthier, saner and less addicted nation.

But with the psycho­pharms able to mesmerise 10, Downing Street into knighting their champion drug­pusher, and able to keep the truth about mental health away from our Royal Family and senior politicians, they can go on creating more and more millions of prescribed involuntarily addicted drug users and methadone prescribed addicts, etc., etc., for as long as they can hide the truth.

Hapless addicts whose supplies are paid for by U.K. Taxpayers, and supplies which generate their own continuing daily demand.

From a marketing viewpoint it is beautifully conceived and cleverly executed. From a humane viewpoint it is cruel, greedy, disastrous, a huge drain on our economy and a destruction of our society.

And it will continue for as long as the lies told about L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics and the Church of Scientology continue to be believed by those politicians who own profitable pharmaceutical shares, or whose policies depend on massive pharmaceutical tax receipts or who are themselves irresistible daily users of addictive pharmaceutical products!

For further information or for discussion, you may wish to phone:

+44 (0)1342) 810151 any weekday between 11.00am and 9.00pm.


CCHR UK Demonstration Highlights Psychiatric Crimes Against Humanity

Protesters gathered at the ExCeL Centre in London on Wednesday 29th June 2016 to highlight the lack of human rights in the field of mental health and to highlight the plight of all ages that fall victim to psychiatric treatments that do more harm than good.

"Love me don't drug me" "Define Better"*: Three young people at the CCHR UK rally, protesting against the psychiatric drugging children for so-called ADHD
Organised by the UK office of the international organisation, the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), the protest coincided with the annual congress (RCPsychIC) put on by the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCoP).

Protesters pointed to the number of dangerous psychiatric drugs prescribed to children and adolescents for controversial disorders, a ‘junk science’ list which includes so-called ‘Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder’ (ADHD). Latest government prescribing figures for ADHD drugs, that are primarily dished out to under-18s, showed that over 1.2 million prescription items were dispensed in 2015, at a cost of nearly £57million to the taxpayer.

Child drugging concerns recently resulted in the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, calling on the UK government earlier this month, to collect data on the amount and regularity of psychotropic drugs being prescribed to children, and make the data transparent.

The RCPsychIC meeting also featured a controversial exhibition on Nazi psychiatric crimes.

"Psychiatry is quackery": CCHR UK protestors and two psychiatric quacks outside ExCel London

Dubbed a confession by critics, the exhibition was titled, "Registered, Persecuted, Annihilated: The Sick and Disabled Under National Socialism", and was based on an admission from the German Association of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology (DGPPN). The admission from the DGPPN confirmed, “There were doctors who were active in and primarily responsible for the different euthanasia organisations. They guided and directed the different euthanasia campaigns.” Psychiatrists “observed and controlled the selection of those to be killed” and “laid the scientific foundations of the euthanasia programme and used the victims for research purposes.”

Childhood is NOT a mental disorder!
Through their publicity, psychiatric associations in both Germany and the UK have attempted to deflect attention off of the atrocities. Even President of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, Professor Sir Simon Wessely openly stated he was proud of the Royal College for making it possible for a UK audience to see the exhibition.

Psychiatry: Drugging Children for Profit
CCHR spokesperson Brian Daniels said, "It is hardly an exhibition to be proud of. “The human rights of millions of people were entirely destroyed by psychiatric ideologies that resulted in the deaths of millions. Furthermore, the exhibition has only been open for attendees of the congress, rather than being open to the general public.”

From German psychiatry’s admission, its apologies to the families of sterilised and euthanised patients, to the current reliance on psychiatric drugs to control behaviour across all ages, psychiatry is in crisis."

For more information, please contact:

Brian Daniels
CCHR UK
brian.daniels@cchr.org.uk
+44 (0)1342 313 926
+44 (0)7980 934 984
http://www.cchr.org.uk

* Define Better is the title of a song, critical of the psychiatric drugging of kids to "treat" fictitious labels, by rap artist and campaigner Chill EB.

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

The FDA Is Hiding Reports Linking Psychiatric Drugs to Homicides

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

'Going Clear' source Karen de la Carriere found to be a liar by LA Superior Court judge


Karen de la Carriere
“The Court has concluded that both parties (and especially Carriere) were untruthful about many aspects of the case – presenting testimony that was false, conflicting, exaggerated and evasive.”

Michael Johnson
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge

Related links: